Other's Responses
-
Sexism is always the answer
-
Umm, shouldn't it still be "was"?
-
The person who wrote this test were extraordinary unintelligent.
-
im sure it's meant to be the girl/boy was extraordinariLY intelligent
-
i wounder what sex the teacher was? lol tiss ll
-
Looks like the English homework from a Norwegian school.
-
you're supposed to correct the grammar... idiots.
-
Typical woman teacher.
-
was is a past tense, it should be the girl is extraordinary intelligent. that right? idk xD
-
lmao if the boy is so much smarter why'd he STILL get the question wrong? and the next one too by the looks of it xD
-
WIN
-
Anyone who thought it should be extraordinary intelligent or extraordinary unintelligent is extraordinarily unintelligent.
-
teacher drew a frowny face. wonder what that means.. ;)
-
A boy wrote the exam and he sucks at grammar.
-
if the boy was sooo intelligent why couldnt he just correct the damn sentence and use the correct grammer? "the boy WERE..." i (an intelligent girl) am pretty sure it should be WAS
-
It's meant to be one of those things where you correct the sentence
-
the dog is run away from home
-
How do you know it's not a 'correct the sentence' piece of homework?
-
He just couldn't believe it... surely an affective answer.
-
I like how he changed it to "boy" then proceeded to get both 4 and 5 wrong.
-
lol sex change
-
Fake, look at the smiley face and the o in extraordinary.
-
ah ah ah!! no citizenship for you!
-
Why is the student writing in red and the teacher in blue?
-
So she's a transsexual, big deal
-
LoL! So many hilarious things about this one. The fact that he's prolly a boy and put "were" instead of "was" to state that boys are smarter than girls.
-
She obviously made him a sandwich
-
:(
-
Sexism. Fine until a boy does it
-
I think it means that a boy wrote the exam.
-
point proven girls are smarter then guys ....the boy?
-
"Shouldn't it be was?" It was a grammar test, idiots.
-
lol you have to change the was to wasn't hahahaha im never gettin laid am i
-
they have to correct the sentences, i guess that's one way to do it
-
wasn't he supposed to change extraordinary to extraordinarILY? I mean changing from girl to boy is unreasonable, changing was to were was stupid, but I think the directions were to change a word in the sentence to the right grammar, sorry Grammar. Then the student was being a sexist, stupid,
-
Well, hmmm... most likely you sir.. (or madam... not likely) are one sexist git.. moving on... NEXT PICTURE!
-
No, "were" is correct for those of you whom failed 1st grade grammar.
-
This is why the boy got the answer wrong . Boy's are NOT extraordinaryly inteligent .
-
"if the boy was sooo intelligent why couldnt he just correct the damn sentence and use the correct grammer? "the boy WERE..." i (an intelligent girl) am pretty sure it should be WAS" You should brush up on your Grammar as well, it's spelt 'Grammar' and not 'grammer'
Sexism is always the answer